Pass that Dutch

Pass that Dutch

I’m blaming the heat in both Paris and Rome for my two day blog absence.  A sun-induced brain fug is not conducive to analysing the haute couture collections in any meaningful way.  But waiting a bit has its rewards.  Getting to the end of Paris haute couture fashion week meant I could talk about not one but two collections that revolved around art – specifically the Flemish masters.  One went beneath the surface of those 16th-18th century paintings, delving deep to make you think, wonder and be excited.  The other simply mined the surface for effect and as a result came off looking facile even though the initial reaction did yield rhapsodic cries of “It’s like art” on social media.  That’s a comment doesn’t always have a positive spin, especially when we’re talking about clothes that are meant to serve a sartorial purpose – and here at haute couture, they’re purpose and custom made for real moving and paying clients.

At Dior, Raf Simons presented a Garden of Earthly Delights that dissected the meaning behind the forbidden fruit of Hieronymous Bosch’s famous triptych.  This garden had purple astroturf with random globular shapes placed haphazardly and was housed inside a “Modernist, Pointillist church” with Georges Seurat-esque dots on acid shimmering all over us.  That’s both Flemish and French art masters ticked off then.  But there was a point to Simons’ multi-epoch, multi-genre referencing.  He’s no stranger to traversing back in time to fine-tune the past into something new.  This time round though, he was cherry picking through art epochs and the way they evolved from one to another (Gothic, Renaissance, Baroque).  That dreaded comment “It’s like art” here isn’t just concentrated into the surface – instead it’s about the ideology and the way styles and eras can be taken out of context and be stratified into something else.  A Hans Holbein-esque status-portraying sleeve can be transplanted onto a sweeping Dior manteau.  17th century criss-crossing chainmail motifs from regal portraiture can be paired with 1970s peasant dresses.  Or going back to Bosch’s painting, Simons played with the theme of the loss of innocence by pitting raging sensuality and virtuous innocence See the virginal sheer high-necked gowns that flowed and fluttered.  On the other hand, expanses of flesh would slyly appear out of nowhere when flower encrusted gowns were turned to the side, held with golden clasps.

There was a lot to digest, take in and think about here.  But isn’t that what “art” – well at least the best sort of art – makes you do?  Simons doesn’t do pure surface.  Even a pretty frock covered in Pointillist dabs of paint (and stunning hand cut feathers ! ) or Monet-esque florals fall under Simons’ grandiose  idea that art, like fashion, is there to be appropriated and decontextualised.  That in itself might not be anything new but once again, Simons’ ideas make you think and rethink about what haute couture can be today.  If anything, he might be ahead of the curve somewhat when you look at the way couture clients are currently trussed up (ballgowns, tulle, lace, embroidery and perhaps too much of it all).  If I had the means, I’d be investigating those immensely majestic coats with their draped pleats that the girls were clutching (a vulnerable gesture that was also about concealing their modesty) or those column-like dresses with their painterly embroideries.  Art in this case hasn’t been regurgitated and thrown out there with shallow intentions.  And that’s why you need a few more days to mull it over.    

0E5A9483

0E5A9507

0E5A9517

0E5A9527

0E5A9534

0E5A9544

0E5A9555

0E5A9564

0E5A9592

0E5A9596

0E5A9602

0E5A9607

0E5A9615

0E5A9619

0E5A9631

0E5A9638

0E5A9644

0E5A9662

0E5A9674

0E5A9683

0E5A9694

0E5A9699

0E5A9712

0E5A9715

0E5A9722

0E5A9729

0E5A9737

0E5A9750

0E5A9761

0E5A9769

0E5A9776

0E5A9787

0E5A9792

0E5A9806

0E5A9795

0E5A9818

0E5A9826

0E5A9841

0E5A9844

0E5A9848

0E5A9852

0E5A9859

0E5A9866

0E5A9871

0E5A9875

0E5A9882

0E5A9897

On Wednesday, Viktor & Rolf tried their hand at performance art, which came off try hard.  I loved their last collection, which announced their intentions to use haute couture as a forum for experiment and high octane vision.  This one however was a head-scratcher.  Collapsible gold frames with stretched bonded linen to mimic canvas engulfed every body.  As the show progressed, so did peeks of Dutch still lifes or The Threatened Swan by Jan Asselijn.  They were printed on the fabrics like cheap posters and then Viktor Horsting and Rolf Snoeren proceeded to lift them off the body and arrange them like car crashed-paintings on the wall.  It was all so… simplistic.  It wasn’t “like” art; it was just the physical representation of art without any of the feeling.  Not surprisingly, images of this show resonated on Instagram.  How could it not?  There was quickfire visual and kitsch appeal aplenty.  Nothing to decipher or think about here.  Just an instantaneous “Wow, that’s cool!”.  This is what the audience en masse want out of fashion.  A piece of cheap ploy theatre that doesn’t have any nuance to it.  The title of the show?  “Wearable art” – if the duo were making fun of the exaggerated way people use this phrase, you couldn’t detect it.  I suppose they get the last laugh.  The pieces have already been bought by art collector Han Nefkens for the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam.

And so the dual nature of haute couture today in Paris continues to be at play.  A designer’s vision, executed at the highest level thanks to the skills of the many petites mains and craftsmen.  It’s either a real and alive working industry with real and alive clients.  Or it’s a pointless vanity project – a decoy used to sell handbags and perfumes.  I know which I prefer.

0E5A0506

0E5A0525

0E5A0563

0E5A0538

0E5A0568

0E5A0544

0E5A0565

0E5A0579

0E5A0574

0E5A0583

0E5A0586

0E5A0589

0E5A0607

0E5A0616

0E5A0617

0E5A0598

0E5A0628

0E5A0640

0E5A0659

13 comments

Leave a comment
  1. sasa

    2015-07-10 at 8:10 PM

    Amazing<3

    Shall We Sasa

  2. Liz

    2015-07-10 at 8:11 PM

    all these clothes are amazing

    giveaway on my blog!

    http://hashtagliz.com

  3. Nellvoyager

    2015-07-10 at 8:16 PM

    Insightful and thought-provoking review. I love your writing. Your point about needing a few days to absorb and assess these shows is so well-made. Couture seems more intense, heady than RTW. So many ideas, shades and such complex work. But at its best- stunning beauty.

  4. Ellie Ramsay

    2015-07-10 at 8:42 PM

    The Dior set-up was so beautiful! I especially love the coats. Compared to the crazy origional ideas of Victor Rolf x
    http://www.therawstylist.com

  5. olga

    2015-07-11 at 4:48 PM

    Thank you so much for an interesting review!

    http://againstandforward.blogspot.com

  6. Celeste

    2015-07-12 at 12:10 AM

    Wow that was pretty harsh. I think couture is definitely dual sided – and a case could be made for both. Couture is essentially a laboratory for designers to express their ideas in their most unadulterated form and sometimes that translates into ‘wearable’ clothes for ‘real clients’ and sometimes it produces – as you so decried – pieces of ‘wearable art’. In my opinion (…not that it matters to anyone) the core of couture is the dream, where pragmatic considerations are done away with, which may or may not produce a finished garment that people want to wear in their day to day lives. There is obviously so much know how, love and craftsmanship in the Viktor and Rolf collection… it feels more than a bit unfair to so wholly lambast it just because it doesn’t hold the same aspect of intellectual ‘nuance’, as you put it, as Raf’s collection.

    • susie

      2015-07-12 at 1:48 PM

      There might well be know how and craftsmanship to bonding linen to crepe and mounting it on frames but it just didn’t appear that way in the show. I don’t criticise it lightly. I absolutely loved Viktor & Rolf’s last show where Dutch Wax fabrics were really used to their fullest and most extreme potential. Here though, the premise just felt a bit lost and redundant as they paraded out. And the way the paintings were printed onto the fabrics themselves. That didn’t necessarily speak of “love” to me – the way those artworks emerged like Photoshopped apparitions on the fabrics with cartoon-like splodges surrounding them. It just looked a bit amateurish if I’m honest. You’re entitled to your opinion of course but for me, seeing them in the flesh, you could see that the craftsmanship wasn’t in fact as impressive as it would appear in pictures. But they do know how to create a visual impact. I’ll give them that. And it has captured people’s imaginations. There’s value in that for sure.

    • nang mui

      2015-07-20 at 4:47 AM

      Very interesting opinions on what couture represents, enjoyed reading a review that isnt all about sucking up to the designers

  7. Paige

    2015-07-12 at 12:26 PM

    Very interesting opinions on what couture represents, enjoyed reading a review that isnt all about sucking up to the designers to secure a seat next season at their shows. beautifully written with food for thought x

  8. Sophie

    2015-07-13 at 6:03 AM

    what amazing craftsmanship.

    http://stylephilosophie.blogspot.de/

  9. Marja

    2015-07-19 at 3:34 PM

    I love Your pictures!

  10. Camille

    2015-08-06 at 9:42 AM

    Art of fashion, I LOVE IT!

Leave a Comment