Hey Boy, Hey Girl

0E5A8321

When I went in to see Chanel’s press day a few months ago, they asked me with a vaguely tentative tone, what I thought of their new “Girl” bag, introduced for S/S 15 and championed by Karl Lagerfeld.  It’s certainly a bag that inspires a “Love it/hate it” reaction judging by the comments on Purse Forum (yes, I only seem to have one source of info where bags are concerned…).  But seeing as I am a lover of similarly divisive foodstuff equivalents like Marmite, oysters and sea urchin, I am, as you guessed, decidedly in the “Love It” camp.  Whilst the bag has been christened as “Girl”, it actually has more of a boyish air, what with its tie-up-yourself straps and postman’s satchel slash record bag feel.  The name is perhaps in reference to tomboy girls who might hang around Camden in Doc Martens and a bag that gets slung around the body rather than say a 2.55 that politely sits on one’s shoulder looking all fancy with its chain hardware.  And its deliberate kitschiness with the body of the bag taking on the shape of a classic Chanel jacket or cardigan is precisely what draws me to it.  Like the S/S 14 art student rucksack, it calls to me with its unapologetic slouchiness.  Just call me contrary.  I like it.  Deal with it.

Perhaps the best thing about the Girl though is the fact that it sort of amalgamates into an outfit depending on how you wear it and so it becomes less bag but more outfit accoutrement that happens to be able to hold phone, wallet, keys and other gubbins such as a Bluetooth keyboard (essential in my case when working on the go).  So when Chanel asked me to have a play around with their Girl, I gladly accepted.  It was touted as a challenge but a quick dip into my current wardrobe favourites (sunlight = less layers) and the Chanel Girl finds herself being tied up all over the place, ever so easily.  Worn as a rucksack, a longer cross-body, a shorter under-the-arm pouch or a bum bag (or hip apron if you will), like I said, the Girl is more of a garment slash accessory.  It’s the sweater that you “nonchalantly” tie around your waist that can double up as a bag.  This is a 2-in-1 that actually has some serious mileage in it.  Just wait until the colder weather come around again, as the layering cogs in my brain are already beginning to turn… 

0E5A8163

0E5A8193

0E5A8157

0E5A8175

0E5A8183Worn with Eo To To jacket, Tome jumpsuit and Celine slip-ons

0E5A8197

0E5A8226

0E5A8208

0E5A8220

0E5A8231Worn with Etre Cecile dress, J. Kim belt and Nicholas Kirkwood flats

0E5A8239

0E5A8276

0E5A8232

0E5A8265

0E5A8277Worn with Bliss & Mischief shirt, Coach skirt and Pollini wedges

0E5A8285

0E5A8310

0E5A8292

0E5A8298

0E5A8305Worn with J. Kim x Masterpeace top, Marques Almeida jeans and Chanel sandals

16 comments

  1. I’ve tried to explain to the males in my life that we women don’t just carry bags–we wear them! This one is delightfully spearheaded by Karl and I think it’s an eclectic whimsical winner for his collection!! xo

    (=’.’=)
    -Lauren
    adorn la femme

  2. God it’s awful. If it wasn’t by Chanel no one would look at it twice. It looks like something you can find in the bargain bin of Claire’s Accessories.

  3. this atrocity is even uglier than the moschino leather jacket bag that it shamelessly copies. At least the moschino one was funny and kitshy and not taking itself seriously.

  4. It’s interesting, it really doesn’t look like Chanel. It looks quite clunky (maybe it’s a bit like the “ugly” shoe trend and will take off??). It looks great on you though, I’m just not sure myself. Definitely a Marmite bag. Emily x

  5. I too think the bag is ugly and the colour, yuck! I think the other colourways are better, but it looks like bags I have seen at local craft fairs, where items of clothing are made into bags. I know nothing is original under the sun, but this misses the mark for me.

Comments are closed.