This Is Not An Art Attack

This Is Not An Art Attack

“This is like art!” is a comment that has popped up on this blog more times than I care to remember.  I am after all, the blogger who sniffs out designers, who can make garments out of balloons (paraphrasing something that Amy Odell wrote on Twitter).  However it’s not necessarily a phrase I’m personally prone to using when writing.  To liken fashion to art is problematic for me in such that it a) suggests that fashion is not as lofty or as worthy an art form in comparison to fine art and b) that fashion has been rendered unwearable and intangible and that it can only be appreciated on a mannequin and behind glass walls in a museum.

In a season when the two fields – art and fashion – have come into cahoots with each other in ways that are more direct and in some cases deliberately literal than ever before, it’s time to re-examine that phrase.  In particular, Karl Lagerfeld confronted it heads on at the Chanel show.  Art isn’t always the lofty and idealistic goody two-shoes elder sister that people often think it is and by comparison, fashion shouldn’t be pitted as the less noble, shallow wayward baby sister.  Case in point, Lagerfeld built himself an art gallery at the Grand Palais, filled with artworks that were faux but convincing at the same time, as they adopted tropes of familiar contemporary art.  If they were transported out of their fashion show context and into the Gagosian Gallery or Haunch of Venison gallery, you would be none the wiser that they were all conjured up out of Lagerfeld’s set design head.

As guests filed in, the #Chanel selfie rampage began.  I saw one particular Chinese girl attempt to have her picture taken with every piece of artwork dotted around the cavernous space, as though it were a theme park to ratch up bonus points, by seeing as many artworks as possible.  Well, it was of sorts.  Some draped their bodies across some of the larger pieces such as the double CC’s sculpture in the corner.  I thought someone might start twerking in front of the giant Chanel No. 5 bottle in a bid to get the best #Chanel selfie out there.  Art for Lagerfeld, particularly in its contemporary form was a commodity, ready to be sold and consumed, much like everything the house of Chanel produces.

Lagerfeld makes no bones about the symbiotic relationship between commerce and fashion.  There was no hoity toity collaboration between Chanel and an artist.  Nor were there even artist references that would send journalists to Artcylopedia.  He simply looked at art as a thematic subject matter, as a field and and occupation to mine for surface-driven inspiration.  So there were flecks of vivid paint around the eyes created by Peter Phillips, socks that bunched up around the ankles, scuffed up and scrawled over backpacks, quilted portfolios and necklaces that resembled pearl-ear headphones for a gang that might have attended an imaginary Central Saint Chanel school.  The super rich of this world might actually send their kids to art schools (that only they can afford perhaps given the rise of school fees and reliance on international students) trussed up in this collection.

That didn’t stop the rest of us from yearning for the lot of it for surface’s sake and that’s what Lagerfeld proposed for us to do instead of faffing around with analysis.  I’d venture to say that this was one of the best Chanel collections I’ve personally ever seen from a wearing standpoint.  More often than not, spectacle takes over the substance of the clothing at a Chanel show, especially in the scale of Grand Palais, where details are easily lost.  I’ll come out of a Chanel show having seen the collection but feeling like I need to go on just to have another visual reminder of the actual clothes.  Here, I remembered pretty much everything.  The silhouettes, the accessories, the attitude, the fabrics (in particular, the ever techy-tweed flecked with translucent pink pvc) and memorable print motif in the form of watercolour paint swatches, that was sometimes pleated or woven from silk strips.  The focus on that one motif towards the end of the show felt fresh for Chanel.

Like I said, when you liken fashion to art, the subtext is that you would prefer to keep said garments at arm’s length.  Karl Lagerfeld has excelled at creating things with a desirability factor that means you instantly want to touch and feel what he’s done.  These are clothes made to be worn and for those fortunate to be able to afford it, they will fly off the rails.  You could say he’s got it down to a fine art.
















































Leave a comment
  1. Becky

    2013-10-04 at 6:51 PM
  2. Denisa

    2013-10-04 at 7:01 PM

    Chanel is always wow.

  3. Second Floor Flat

    2013-10-04 at 7:20 PM

    Glad to see images of the actual art behind the clothing. Not that I didn’t want to see the clothing, but I’d been dying to get an up-close glimpse at the artwork. Et voila!

  4. Leslie

    2013-10-04 at 8:04 PM

    I loved this! It was so rad!

  5. FashionSnag

    2013-10-04 at 10:01 PM

    The best collection!

  6. Chloe

    2013-10-04 at 10:39 PM

    Man, i don’t care AT ALL if number 3 isn’t ”officially” ”art”, I would pay a ton! It’s so cute, which I think is a perfectly awesome reason to buy an art piece!

  7. milex

    2013-10-05 at 1:30 AM

    that’s just a dream.

  8. Rachelle

    2013-10-05 at 3:28 AM

    Brilliant perspective, as always! “Art isn’t always the lofty and idealistic goody two-shoes elder sister that people often think it is and by comparison, fashion shouldn’t be pitted as the less noble, shallow wayward baby sister.” I think fashion and art are more like BFFs 😉

  9. Iris

    2013-10-05 at 9:10 AM

    Ha love your description, I wouldn’t dare to be so obnoxious at a Chanel show 🙂 Love this whole collection and the show concept, might I get rich I’m going to have to get my hands on some pieces!
    xoxo Iris

  10. The Provoker

    2013-10-05 at 10:56 AM

    OMG I was there!!! How did I miss you! I loved the set, it was so fun and you can see the audience having so much fun with the backdrops, taking group pics of selfies with them, some were super weird which just added to the awesomeness that is Karl for Chanel. And this is exactly what I hoped for, Chanel canvases, which would validate my dedication to art… somehow?
    xx The Provoker

  11. Elisa

    2013-10-05 at 11:00 AM

    Great !!! I love Chanel!!
    With love,
    My Fantabulous World

  12. canvas prints

    2013-10-05 at 3:22 PM

    There is so much beautiful colours in those dresses.

  13. Iwona

    2013-10-05 at 7:18 PM

    Very interesting post!

  14. Raivyn dK

    2013-10-06 at 1:35 AM

    I love the theme of this show. Great shots!

  15. xeb

    2013-10-06 at 12:16 PM

    haha its very pop dats for sure
    having a summer sale on my designs / check it

  16. Clare

    2013-10-06 at 2:53 PM

    This is absolutely amazing, it looks like a dream space! I’d definitely be up for the Chanel selfies…
    Tweet Tweet x

  17. Mary thomson

    2013-10-06 at 3:06 PM
    Check out my blog about fashion and makeup 🙂

  18. Asalia

    2013-10-06 at 4:15 PM

    Lol I will never understand why are people crazy about the modern art. IT is so weird!

  19. Tracy Thomason

    2013-10-12 at 6:17 PM

    Barf. What a flaccid attempt at a troped-out version of fashion and art-student. This collection is rendered nothing more than a faux punk cartoon and exists as yet another example of the late capitalist mantra “too big to fail”. I expect more from Karl and the legacy of Chanel.

  20. vanita

    2015-06-27 at 6:45 AM

    Great Fashion Show. I love the theme of this show.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.